Looking for:
Adobe animate cc vs moho pro free download |
Download Creative Cloud.Adobe animate cc vs moho pro free download
Post by heiseman » Fri Apr 10, am. Post by jayfaker » Fri Apr 10, pm. Post by heiseman » Sat Apr 11, am. Post by Lukas » Sat Apr 11, am. Post by chucky » Mon Apr 13, am. Post by InfoCentral » Tue Apr 14, pm. Post by chucky » Wed Apr 15, am. Post by herbert » Sat Apr 18, am. Post by Greenlaw » Sun Apr 19, am. Post by jahnocli » Sun Apr 19, am. Post by Greenlaw » Sun Apr 19, pm. Post by jayfaker » Thu Apr 23, pm. Post by Greenlaw » Thu Apr 23, pm. Style by Arty - Update phpBB 3.
Privacy Terms. Moho Forum Skip to content. Quick links. Logout Register. A place to discuss non-Moho software for use in animation. Video editors, audio editors, 3D modelers, etc.
And that live-cam stuff looks a bit gimmicky. But, looking forward to how a bit of healthy competition will shape the future of ASP. Check out my animations: Motionlab Animations Motionlab on Vimeo. At the moment it's really just a face tracker for face animation and a mouse tracker for everything else. All other functionality will come from third-party developers. For now, it seems more of a stand-alone tool than a full-featured software package.
Is it valuable? I think the face tracker will be useful for animators needing to create countless hours of video to get to the top of Youtube's suggestion lists again. Lot's of cheap crap is more valuable to Youtube than a couple of pieces of gold, unfortunately. That'd be pretty cool. There are plenty of other competitors to watch out for already, though. I think they just focused on the face tracking feature as it's more of a selling point in their opinion.
The motion capture stuff is horrible for animation, but I can imagine it's awesome for kids theater or concerts and stuff. Sequential offender. They are not new to this. As for their mocap in 2D going forward, Crazy Talk Animator already is doing full body. COM - start or join a group. I would never use that seriously. I don't think After Effects team should be focused on that kind of features.
It looks rather a cell app than a "real" feature. Moho Product Manager www. Again, it's not a software I would use in any "pro" work. It's more something funny to play with my cousins. That's why it looks so odd as part of After Effects, which is a fantastic "pro" software. Anyway, of course it's just my opinion. The major difference being actual implementation rather than concept. If you don't like 'the idea ' of performance capture - then you are already prejudiced , despite that , the Character Animator looks like even in beta that it actually works and is very customisable and full featured.
On the other hand the character wizard looks like development was finished before it was half way complete is so limited in its application , and barely usable especially for any task. The character wizard concept has worth , but the implementation has a negative value.
I, on the other hand, thought it was kinda neat for how little effort was we put into this test--the head tilting, the shifty eyes, it was entirely on autopilot. Never quite figured out what I wanted to do the tech though. At the time I thought I could use CrazyTalk to generate mouth shapes for 2D or even 3D animations but it was just a little too weird looking--reminded me of those vintage Clutch Cargo and Space Angel shows.
Seriously, real mouths on cartoons are just creepy. Last edited by Greenlaw on Sun Apr 19, pm, edited 1 time in total. I did something similar with a Hellboy action figure a while back; I'll see if I can dig it out In case the dialogue isn't obvious, the 2 phrases are: "How'm I ever going to get a girl?
I drive around in a garbage truck", and "Don't get psychic with me, fella" Not great lip-sync by any means, but a quick and dirty way of getting an action figure to speak. Thanks for sharing that. Re: Adobe Character Animator vs Anime Studio Pro Post by jayfaker » Thu Apr 23, pm I finally watched the character animator video and I'm now convince that for now, the biggest impact it will have is on youtube videos. Will it be amazing animation? Not at all. Maybe developers will even automate squash and stretch, IK, anticipation, and follow through.
Ultimately it may be a cool tool where you could animate in real time in passes. First pass the body, then the face, then anticipation, etc.
I think it'll take a while to get there. But for now it'll make "animated" series much more profitable on youtube. If good design sense is applied, and the content relies more on witty dialog over action and sight gags, it could work. But once the content creator has established his technical workflow, the really hard part will be in keeping up the quality and freshness of the writing because, in the long run, that's all you have. Not saying that to discourage anybody, just stating that it will certainly be challenging.
And I would love to see somebody pull it off!
Comments
Post a Comment